"We are all in the gutter, but some of us..."
Taking Trash Seriously.
"...are looking at the stars."
-- Oscar Wilde
April 27, 2006
Price: Your 2¢

This site is updated Thursday afternoon with a new article about an artistic pursuit generally considered to be beneath consideration. James Schellenberg probes science-fiction, Carol Borden draws out the best in comics, Chris Szego dallies with romance and Ian Driscoll stares deeply into the screen. Click here for their bios and individual takes on the gutter. Our Guest Stars shine here

While the writers have considerable enthusiasm for their subjects, they don't let it numb their critical faculties. Tossing away the shield of journalistic objectivity and refusing the shovel of fannish boosterism, they write in the hopes of starting honest and intelligent discussions about these oft-enjoyed but rarely examined artforms. Contact us here.


Recent Features


Noir, With Feelings

noirdresden-small.jpgSome types of stories are so familiar that the only way to tell your own version of, say, a detective yarn is to find an interesting new angle. Jim Butcher's Harry Dresden series makes the title character a wizard who solves supernatural crimes in Chicago. Additionally, Harry has feelings, which seems like the more interesting wrinkle to me.
Continue reading...


Holding Out For a Hero

bittyhero.JPGI recently read a column by Ilona Andrews about heroes, which A) though light-hearted was also informative, and B) I immediately decided to steal use as a springboard for an article of my own.<

There’s a lot of discussion as to the role of the hero in modern Romance. Is he a placeholder for the reader, as some would suggest? A Jungian construct created to be the catalyst for the heroine’s own transformation? The prize for surviving the plot? Maybe. But I don’t think the hero represents any one thing - at least, not all the time. And definitely not every hero.

Continue reading...


Fooling the System

splinter cell conviction 80.jpg"Fisher," they'd cry, "we're going to find you." They were looking in the wrong place. I was already somewhere else. And as they approached the last position they saw me, that somewhere else was right behind them. Either a clean bullet to the head or some other form of quick, close, personal death, they slump to the floor, and I leave them for their friends to find.

And so the cycle would begin again.

***

Continue reading...


Forgetful?

Perhaps you'd like an e-mail notification of our weekly update.

 
 

Stickhandlers

by Guy Leshinski

For many of us, the first thing we learned to draw was Homo Anorexia: the Stick Figure.

Stick figuring.A circle, a few straight lines, and there it was: a shaky but recognizable approximation of the human body. The Stick waltzed into our games (hangman), the surreptitious notes we passed around in class (“Mr. Biderman eats monkey spooge!”) and, for a select few, the artwork we developed in adulthood. Many art schools still teach their students to begin with a Stick, to pose it like a skeletal Gumby before adding the flesh and fineries.

Like its cousin the smiley face, the Stick is an icon, pliant enough for a million uses. Its simplicity, however, has made it an emblem of artlessness. If anyone can draw it, the reasoning goes, why bother? Yet the emergence of a thriving alternative-comics industry has created an outlet — and an audience — for cartoonists who defy such conventions, even those who base their work on this touchstone of artistic ineptitude.

Sam Brown is one such deviant. Brown is a cartoonist and illustrator from Connecticut whose comics blog (http://www.explodingdog.com/) is a virtual Stick theatre, a collection of colourful panels with whimsical captions (a recent sample: “fairy on a mushroom looking at a butterfly or the stars”) and a cast overrun with underdrawn toons. He makes his comics in Photoshop using a Wacom tablet, a digital drawing board with an electronic stylus — hi-fi tools for such lo-fi work. The drawings are crude, which keeps his cartoons from becoming precious, though the panels are composed with obvious care, and his stories, some of which are available in booklets and sold through his site, are absorbing. One of his best, 2002’s New Job, concerns a hapless office drone on his first day at work who is given the Kafkaesque task of finding something without being told what it is.

Brown’s comics wobble between adult whimsy and children’s lit. They would equally suit the head shop and the daycare. His work is sweet, slightly melancholy, and it proves one of comics’ counterintuitive rules: the simpler the characters are drawn, the more the reader — provided the story holds our interest — will identify with them.

It’s what comics theorist Scott McCloud calls amplification through simplification, the abstraction of an image to its essential “meaning” (one circle for a head, two smaller circles for eyes, etc.). This focuses our attention on just those bits, and encourages us to fill in the rest.

This certainly happens with Brown’s comics. We read nuance into his characters’ vacant faces, find expression in the slightest shift of the eyeballs’ distance from the mouth, see grace in the scribbled hand rubbing the bottom of the circle (what we know instinctively is the chin). We even find ourselves coming to like these strange, empty vessels. They seem alive somehow, in a way the hyperarticulated work of a more technical cartoonist rarely does.

Vancouver’s Dustin Ladd also draws Sticks, and he wants his to live in three dimensions. Ladd’s strip is called Almost Evil (read it at http://www.dustinladd.com/). Its world is large and bare, as sparsely furnished as that of Peanuts, though the occasional prop (a fridge, a bureau) is exquisitely drawn. Sticking to what works.

The strip’s essence, however, is our pre-caloric man. Each male figure sports the same earless head and rapier limbs. (The girls, at least, get mops of hair.) The contrast between these facile figures and their naturalistic environment is a constant source of yuks. Ladd trades often in puns, both verbal and visual — especially ones that toy with the characters’ relationship to their surrounding panels. In one memorable strip, a Stick steps out of his panel onto the blank page, only to start gasping for air and clawing back into the frame.

But Ladd doesn’t trust his conceit as fully as Brown does. He notably gives his Sticks expressive, articulate hands, and accents their movements with a full glossary of motion lines and effects. What makes Brown’s surface simplicity poignant is the care of its presentation and the equally austere story it helps tell. It gives us permission to overlook the artwork’s glaring, intentional omissions. Ladd is afraid we might not get it. He wants to subvert the conventions of cartooning. But not enough to be called a hack.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Chuck your 2¢ into the Gutter
Stickhandlers - The Cultural Gutter
Lost your 2¢? Write us.

Paw through our archives

Of Note Elsewhere
The ever-wondrous Pink Tentacle is waving around creepy children's book illustrations by Gojin Ishihara. They're like the little lure on an angler fish and I'm totally going for it.
~
Share your most tentacular and... tentual?... erotica with Cthulhurotica. I bet they'd even take your H.P. Lovecraft/August Derleth slash fiction...
~
Bladewood provides us all a much needed timeline of the events in the Doctor Who season/series 5 finale. Watch your head, please.
~
Sharktopus is now a film, but my heart is still with Bearsharktopus.
~
Swank up all your cultic rites with the Cthulkhulele.
~

View all Notes here.
Seen something shiny? Gutter-talk worth hearing? Let us know!

On a Quest?

Pete Fairhurst made us this Mozilla search plug-in. Neat huh?

Obsessive?

Then you might be interested in knowing you can subscribe to our RSS feed, find us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


Follow CulturalGutter on TwitterFacebook Buttons By ButtonsHut.comFacebook Buttons By ButtonsHut.com


This site is autoconstructed by v4.01 of Movable Type and is hosted by No Media Kings.

Thanks To

Canada Council
We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts which last year invested $20.3 million in writing and publishing throughout Canada.