This site is updated Thursday afternoon with a new article about an artistic pursuit generally considered to be beneath consideration. James Schellenberg probes science-fiction, Carol Borden draws out the best in comics, Chris Szego dallies with romance and Ian Driscoll stares deeply into the screen. Click here for their bios and individual takes on the gutter. Our Guest Stars shine here
While the writers have considerable enthusiasm for their subjects, they don't let it numb their critical faculties. Tossing away the shield of journalistic objectivity and refusing the shovel of fannish boosterism, they write in the hopes of starting honest and intelligent discussions about these oft-enjoyed but rarely examined artforms. Contact us here.
Recent Features
Disconnected Viewing
I don't have cable right now so I'm rewatching old shows and movies. A lot of them are animated. Such is my way. I'd like to have a nobler reason for rewatching them--something like when James revisited his favorite childhood books. And it's true—he did inspire me. But it's also true that I don't have cable.
Let's say you're the newly-sentient internet. How would you decipher
the meaning of all the bits and bytes whizzing past you? And what about
the real world outside your electronic realm?
Former Comics Editor, Guy Leshinski
has very kindly given us permission to reprint a prophetic interview
with Bryan Lee O'Malley in 2005. Will Bryan Lee O'Malley attain the
Holy Grail of cartoonists? As Bryan says, "We'll see..."
There’s a girl sitting on the subway.
She’s 16 or so, in a brown corduroy jacket and a pair of faded
sneakers, her feet propped on the seat across from her. She’s
absently brushing on lipstick, absorbed by Bryan Lee O’Malley’s
graphic novel Scott Pilgrim’s Precious Little Life: Volume 1.
Results tagged “Margot Kidder” from The Cultural Gutter
If You Could Turn Back Time
You remember the ending of the original Superman movie starring
Christopher Reeve, directed by Richard Donner: Superman, too late to
save Lois Lane, flies around the world at tremendous speed, reversing
events so he can have another chance to save her. The facts seem
straightforward, but I find that people do not agree on the
interpretation of this scenario - and, in particular, what it means to
spin the world backwards.
I'm fairly sure the writers of the increasingly lame Superman film series didn't think about much at all. In fact, Dave, you've probably now offered more time and energy to the subject than any of the actual screenwriters. (Remember, these were the artistes who posited Luthor's "evil genius plot" to steal nuclear missiles should hinge on a U.S. military convoy stopping at the sight of a prone Valerie Perine.) The question that always dogs my mind - and actually dogged my mind when I saw the film as a kid - is why Superman didn't reverse time to an earlier point; perhaps a point at which he could more conveniently stop Luthor's plot?