This site is updated Thursday afternoon with a new article about an artistic pursuit generally considered to be beneath consideration. James Schellenberg probes science-fiction, Carol Borden draws out the best in comics, Chris Szego dallies with romance and Ian Driscoll stares deeply into the screen. Click here for their bios and individual takes on the gutter. Our Guest Stars shine here
While the writers have considerable enthusiasm for their subjects, they don't let it numb their critical faculties. Tossing away the shield of journalistic objectivity and refusing the shovel of fannish boosterism, they write in the hopes of starting honest and intelligent discussions about these oft-enjoyed but rarely examined artforms. Contact us here.
Recent Features
Disconnected Viewing
I don't have cable right now so I'm rewatching old shows and movies. A lot of them are animated. Such is my way. I'd like to have a nobler reason for rewatching them--something like when James revisited his favorite childhood books. And it's true—he did inspire me. But it's also true that I don't have cable.
Let's say you're the newly-sentient internet. How would you decipher
the meaning of all the bits and bytes whizzing past you? And what about
the real world outside your electronic realm?
Former Comics Editor, Guy Leshinski
has very kindly given us permission to reprint a prophetic interview
with Bryan Lee O'Malley in 2005. Will Bryan Lee O'Malley attain the
Holy Grail of cartoonists? As Bryan says, "We'll see..."
There’s a girl sitting on the subway.
She’s 16 or so, in a brown corduroy jacket and a pair of faded
sneakers, her feet propped on the seat across from her. She’s
absently brushing on lipstick, absorbed by Bryan Lee O’Malley’s
graphic novel Scott Pilgrim’s Precious Little Life: Volume 1.
There’s lots to enjoy about romance novels. The arc of character development. The layered emotional content. The rare and welcome sense of success (otherwise known as the happy ending). A good romance novel is a singular pleasure.
A bad one, on the other hand, can be excruciating.
That said, I’m not going to use this column to slag a particular romance novel. That badly spelled, troll-like niche is overfilled with one-star reviews on Amazon. And outside of obvious cases of poor writing, ‘bad’ can be subjective. Just yesterday I was searching for reviews about a new writer whose work has delighted me. The reviews ranged from “Utterly brilliant!’ to "Meh" - sometimes even about the same scenes. Besides, I know lots of romance writers, and many of them know where I live. So instead I’ll look to the general, and take aim at trends.
Architecture; music; food; wallpaper patterns: all creative endeavours have trends. Romance is no exception. Occasionally a trend will grow past its boundary and become a subgenre in its own right. Other trends, thankfully, are left behind. Some trends are mini-skirts and some are stirrup pants. What follows is a selection of some of the major romance trends in recent years that I’d like to see put into storage.
The Scottish Romance: Let’s get this straight: I love Scotland. The first time I saw the hills of Inverness, I couldn’t sleep for happiness. A story set against the backdrop of epic Jacobian disaster can be moving and mythic. But I think we’ve hit the saturation point of bad Sean Connery imitations masquerading as dialogue. Writers need to do more than hit the marks of plaid, heather and brogue. Being Scottish is not a plot. The Vampire Romance: I talked about this a while backand still think a good vampire romance can explore issues of sex and death and loss in a unique way. Unfortunately, this trend is being sucked dry of what made it so popular. The very real darkness at the core of the vampire mythos is being replaced by the appearance of it. And so the endless sorrow of yesterday’s vampire has become the angst of today’s Goth. Sigh. The Doctor/Nurse Romance: Once extremely popular, this trend has settled into a quiet corner. It’s still one of my personal peeves, though I’m aware I may be alone in my annoyance. Many romance writers began their reading careers on doctor-and-nurse books, and that first love stays with you. Romance publishing giant Harlequin got its start with medical romances. But really, by 2008 can’t at least half the doctors be female (and half the nurses male)? The Overreaching Paranormal: I read the back cover blurb of a book that featured a vampire/werewolf hybrid, along with, I think, a centaur, some sort of fairy, and a Valkyrie. I didn’t get around to reading page one. As longtime fantasy reader, I appreciate the legitimization of the paranormal romance - this trend is a definitely a mini-skirt - but a little restraint, please. Mythic traditions aren’t herbs to be tossed in by the handful. Development is key. The Cowboy’s Bride’s Secret Baby: Several years ago, category romance publishers noticed that the most popular books in any given month tended to feature either: A) cowboys, B) brides, or C) secret babies. You can imagine what happened next. This trend is over, thank goodness. Funny thing is, even the writers hated it. The phrase still floats around writers forums, though, as a term of contempt... and as a testament to the power of the marketing departments.
~~~
Chris Szego used to own a pair of yellow stirrup pants. Then she graduated from junior high.
What if the cowboy's bride's secret baby is really a vampire because the bride had an affair in Inverness with a doctor who was actually a demon-lover--say James Harris--straight out of a demon-lover ballad?
There would be plenty of flashbacks between 1880 and 1780 as the doctor reflected on his past bleeding people in the highlands. At the climax, the cowboy could choose love over pride and confront the demon with his bowie knife, a la Quincy Morris in Dracula. Or am I just causing trouble?
—Carol Borden
"And so the endless sorrow of yesterday’s vampire has become the angst of today’s Goth."
Just wanted to say that this is an epic line.
—Agent Fisher
It's interesting to see (for me anyways) how the romance field has embraced the fantasy/science fiction/horror tinge. Respect among equals? And I'm always curious to see what makes a trend durable - surely the vampire romance should be beaten to death by now! - and what makes it fade away. I seem to recall more of a buzz around the romance/science fiction crossing a few years ago... is that still going?
—James Schellenberg
It used to be canonical thought that 'paranormal' = 'zero sales'. This didn't stop many romance writers from producing some. Sadly, most of them did tank. Jayne Ann Krentz, a genre giant, nearly sank her career with futuristic romances.
In this, as in so many other things, Nora Roberts may have paved the way. She wrote both time-travel and magical fantasy books, for category publisher Silhouette. You have to understand, if paranormals were frowned upon by single title publishers, they were absolutely unthinkable in category publishing. Nora wrote 'em anyway. Lo and behold, readers loved them (this was before she was OMG!NORA!).
And Carol: the worst of the cowboy/bride/baby trend was that it also often involved amnesia. (upon the part of the bride or the cowboy - a baby with amnesia would be redundant). Honestly, it was as if the entire southwest was populated with people in either Stetsons or bridal gowns carrying babies and saying "Who am I?" Ugh.
—Chris Szego
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the piece. Much snorting of beverage out of nose ensued during reading (Carol's comment did not help matters). The paranormal romance thing is interesting to me, because it seems like there are so many romance elements in sci-fi and horror fiction that often go unrecognized. The one big example I can think of is Anne Rice. I mean, what is Interview with a Vampire but a romance, except with a man as the seducee?
I was at a feminist sci-fi convention recently, WisCon, and an author mentioned that she loved paranormal romances, but found she much prefered the ones shelved in sci-fi or speculative fiction rather than the romance section. Aside from some obvious anti-romance prejudice, do you think her preference reflects different genre expections?
—weed
It's likely, Weed. In SFF, the romantic element is usually a subplot; in Romance, it's the whole deal. That's part of why Laurell K. Hamilton had such a reader shift over the course of her writing career: she went from dark fantasy with a romantic/erotic subplot to erotica with remnants of a tiny dark fantasy plot.
But you're definitely right that there are many, many romantic elements in SF/F/Horror. Readers are humans, and we humans like to read about relationships. Good ones, bad ones; ones both like and unlike any we've ever experienced.
It's likely, Weed. In SFF, the romantic element is usually a subplot; in Romance, it's the whole deal. That's part of why Laurell K. Hamilton had such a reader shift over the course of her writing career: she went from dark fantasy with a romantic/erotic subplot to erotica with remnants of a tiny dark fantasy plot.
But you're definitely right that there are many, many romantic elements in SF/F/Horror. Readers are humans, and we humans like to read about relationships. Good ones, bad ones; ones both like and unlike any we've ever experienced.
Wicked posters for Raleigh, North Carolina's Cinema Overdrive film series.
~
Here are some pictures of the ladies reading comics for Read Comics in Public Day. As Gail Simone writes, "Take note everybody in comics!" (For the record, Carol read Kurosagi Corpse Delivery Service 5 on a sidewalk bench, but there's no photo).
~
48 vs. 61 in Rintaro and Katsushiro Otomo's excellent bicycle racing short where the racers look kinda like Rintaro and Otomo. Also, damn fine music and possible steampunkery.
~
Klingon opera has finally happened. Get an earful at Cinematical. (The musical part begins at about 2:15).