"We are all in the gutter, but some of us..."
Taking Trash Seriously.
"...are looking at the stars."
-- Oscar Wilde
February 17, 2004
Price: Your 2¢

This site is updated Thursday at noon with a new article about an artistic pursuit generally considered to be beneath consideration. James Schellenberg probes science-fiction, Carol Borden draws out the best in comics, Chris Szego dallies with romance, and Ian Driscoll stares deeply into the screen.

While the writers have considerable enthusiasm for their subjects, they don't let it numb their critical faculties. Tossing away the shield of journalistic objectivity and refusing the shovel of fannish boosterism, they write in the hopes of starting honest and intelligent discussions about these oft-enjoyed but rarely examined artforms. Click here for the writer's bios and their individual takes on the gutter.


Recent Features


SHAMELESS AND GREEDY PEOPLE OF DISMAL TASTE

Tax_80.jpgInterviewed about the legacy of Canadian tax shelter films in Cinema Canada in 1985, Mordecai Richler said,

"I think they squandered a grand opportunity and it's largely the fault of producers who were shameless and greedy, people of dismal taste, who were more interested in making deals than films and who made a lot of money for themselves. And so Canadian films do not enjoy a larger reputation anywhere and it's a pity... a lot of damage has been done."

Well, Mordecai, I couldn’t disagree more.

Continue reading...


Perfect Candidates for Costumed Aggression

mallah with mask 80.jpgAlienated, ranting about how the world could be perfected if only the fools would listen, plotting intricate schemes, focusing great minds on tiny slights, losing their beloved and scarred by experiments gone awry, revenging themselves on the world, supervillains are where it's at. Here are some of my favorite villains--in alphabetical order to avoid retribution.

Continue reading...


Old Reliable?

odd2.jpgDean Koontz has been on the bestseller list with his books for quite a few decades now; one of his current series started with a book called Odd Thomas in 2003. Odd (that’s his first name) sees dead people. I see an old idea in new clothes. Continue reading...


Forgetful?

Perhaps you'd like an e-mail notification of our weekly update.

 
 

Easy Prey

by James Schellenberg

You can't trust anyone: body snatchers in the 1950s, nanoparticles today.Prey is the latest science fiction thriller from perennial best-selling author, Michael Crichton. It's been a few years since I read any Crichton novels so I was curious to see if my memory of his work - topical, easy to read in the way that bestsellers have, but flat and unoriginal - holds true for his current writing. Crichton used to be a guilty pleasure for me. Does he still fulfill that function in his new book?

A military-funded venture in nanoparticles ("micro-robots" as the back cover so helpfully informs us) goes dreadfully wrong in Prey. Tech experts Jack and Julia, a married couple who are undergoing some domestic strife, both end up at a remote research station trying to fix the problem. A swarm of nanoparticles has been accidentally released into the environment and it is quickly developing new behaviour. Jack doesn't think the wild swarm is a big problem; he's soon proved wrong by death after death. The plot strategy resolves into a simple and-then-there-were-none pile of corpses until only Jack and a handful of other researchers are left alive. And has the swarm infiltrated the installation and learned a new strategy?

Crichton gives us some body-horror sequences at this point that resemble nothing so much as Invasion of the Body Snatchers, in an attempt to give us a narrative payoff for the domestic struggles. Specifically, can Jack trust Julia? The answer is an obvious no, considering that her body has been taken over by a freakish entity bent on world domination. This is hardly a nuanced ending for a story of family and relationship angst. Originally, the Invasion of the Body Snatchers brought a pure jolt of paranoia to the 1950s, literalizing fears that may or may not have been valid. Crichton seems to have lifted these tactics wholesale without considering that a) the Cold War is over and b) modern audiences have been exposed to more sophisticated stories than this (I'll give some examples later).

Jack discovers later in the story that the researchers deliberately released the nanoparticles into the environment because they were stuck and wanted to let the evolutionary software approach find their solutions for them. An intriguing idea. With their company in a risky financial situation, this seemed like the only way to save the day. Such a combination of hubris and greed, however, can have only one reward in a Crichton thriller: destruction and death by the forces of haywire technology. In more memorable stories, this has been represented by the chomping jaws of a dinosaur or bullets from the gun of a malfunctioning theme park robot (Jurassic Park and Westworld respectively).

You can't trust anyone: body snatchers in the 1950s, nanoparticles today.
Jurassic Park and Westworld were memorable because they found effective (if simple-minded) metaphors to talk about fears of technology. Science fiction works well when it can literalize a metaphor about how we live. For example, the alien is a helpful stand-in for the Other; alien stories that want to scare us will play on our xenophobia, while more sophisticated stories will show us how to be tolerant if that's what's necessary. But this process has benefits and hazards. The downside is that it's a lot of work to think up new metaphors, and the genre tends to use them up quickly. In other words, Jurassic Park worked a dozen years ago but it wouldn't necessarily work today. Unfortunately, Prey looks backward rather than forward, recycles rather than makes new.

Is there a better way to talk about nanotechnology? The Crichton formula has been reduced to: new technology is bad. The lifelessness of this approach in Prey makes a stark contrast with other sf stories about nanotechnology. For example, Karl Schroeder's Permanence features a society called the Rights Economy. This is a system in which nanites (i.e. nanoparticles) are embedded in every object, like chairs, books, cars, and so forth. These nanites register every use of any object or bit of intellectual property and force users to make payments to the copyright owner. Talk about horrifying! Far more so than any Body Snatcher plot, and far more topical. What do we want from new technology? To augment corporate control of our lives? Schroeder's book makes us think about the relationship between commercial interests and high-tech in a very urgent way.

Prey also exhibits a failure of nerve in that the ending returns the world to the status quo. What would happen if nanotechnology truly got out of control? Greg Bear's Blood Music, nearly 20 years old now, shows us a world taken over by replicating cells. The full-blown apocalypse of this story is both bold and imaginative, with a greater impact because of the sheer scale of the problem.

Lacking any of these ambitious ideas, Prey is an easy book to read; it feels like a short story, and it's not very challenging. The book clearly sold a lot of copies - bookstores use Prey to fill out those mountainous displays at the front of the store - and has probably given bored travellers a few thrills and chills on their way to their destination. But it's not much more than an airport book, it's a snack more than a fulfilling meal. And even Crichton's previous snacks were better than this one.

Tags: , ,

Chuck your 2¢ into the Gutter
Easy Prey - The Cultural Gutter
Lost your 2¢? Write us.

Paw through our archives

Of Note Elsewhere
"Giant Intelligent Commie Apes!" Just what it says.
~
All Star Batman in nine goddamn panels. Courtesy of the ironically-named I Love Rob Liefeld blog
~
Bully for The League of Paranatural Persons, aka, "Old Timey X-Men!" 
~
With issue 82, Catwoman's time as a title is done.  At least for now.  Devon at Rack Raids has a nice little testimonial
~
John explains it all in his podcast, "You Will Not Make It In Hollywood." He also talks about geekery, fan films and reminsces about a crappy movie. (And Carol warning: two segments are from "Godzilla vs. MechaRealism" and "Frank Miller's Hot Gates").
~

View all Notes here.
Seen something shiny? Gutter-talk worth hearing? Let us know!

On a Quest?

Pete Fairhurst made us this Mozilla search plug-in. Neat huh?

Obsessive?

Then you might be interested in knowing you can get an RSS Feed here, and that the site is autoconstructed by v4.01 of Movable Type and is hosted by No Media Kings.

Thanks To

Canada Council
We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts which last year invested $20.3 million in writing and publishing throughout Canada.